Exposing the Mass Immigration Agenda
Have you lived in a capital or a larger city for decades and in the last 10-15 years you have observed its demographics slowly shifting to predominantly non-natives? This has been the case for many first world nations where mass-immigration has exploded in the past 10-15 years, giving rise to a multitude of issues that are now plaguing these societies. There is however ample statistical data and information from the “culprits” themselves that can help us get a deeper look into the situation and why it exists in the first place.
Refugees, immigrants and asylum seekers are akin to drugs and mafia gangs: everyone knows they are illegal yet they are all over the place, nobody dares to question or challenge their presence and governments were supposed to protect their territories while in the “background” it looks like they are doing the exact opposite by supporting them. There is a strange but yet revealing similarity between “asylum seekers” that have settled in Europe or North America in the millions in very strange circumstances and the existence of drugs and mafia gangs, toxic elements that should not exist in a civilized society but yet they are widespread and present in every corner of every street in most capitals and larger cities.
The refugee crisis is not just a matter of foreign people showing up into Europe or United States “out of nowhere” and demanding asylum. It is a complex situation that extends on multiple fronts and reasons. This can be more easier explained in 3 steps:
1. Refugees and asylum seekers have to be “created”, meaning that something major has to happen in their home countries that forces millions of inhabitants to be displaced and to seek re-settlement in another safer neighboring countries.
2. European Union, European governments, United States Federal Government and local governments and other authorities have changed their legislation in order to create a legal ground for millions of people to be “granted asylum”.
3. The Western infrastructure that was supposed to offer decent and prosperous lives to the natives and their future generations has to be put on the table to “integrate” these large masses of foreign people.
To understand how are refugees “created”, we first need to see where are most refugees coming from. According to world population review [1], the top 10 countries with the most international refugees are Syria, Ukraine, Venezuela, Afghanistan, Columbia, Democratic Republic of Congo, Palestine, Somalia, Yemen and Sudan. Adding to these, there are millions of refugees created from other nations like Iraq and Nigeria. What most of these countries have in common is that wars or civil wars are the main cause of the mass displacement of millions of people, followed then by corruption and severe poverty. What most of these wars have in common is that they have been created and engineered by an “association” consisting of the United States government, army and private military manufacturers such as Lockheed Martin, Boeing or Raytheon (the “US military-industrial complex” [2]), Israel, predominantly United Kingdom France from Europe and the local cannon fodder militants from every country where they support the anti-government or anti-peace movements of each civil war [3]. Here is where United States gets its infamous reputation of “bringing democracy and freedom” to countries that do not oblige to the demands of Jewish-owned corporations that have economical interests in the natural resources of the affected countries.
The so-called “civil wars” (none of which were exactly “civil”) that have been happening in Middle East are taking place out of two reasons:
- to protect Israel against its hostile neighbors. This is due to decades of Israeli expansion in Palestine, genocide of reportedly hundreds of thousands of people since the establishment of the Jewish state in 1948 and numerous attacks launched by Israel over the years towards its neighbors, hence why is easy to understand why most of the Middle East and the muslim world in general consider Israel their biggest threat and enemy. United States has been providing billions and billions of dollars in military and economic support to Israel in all these years. Basically, Israel’s entire very technologically advanced military exists for a great part due to American support, funding and provision of equipment, technology and information.
- to facilitate access of jewish-run oil corporations and big-pharma to oil, opium and other precious natural resources in Middle East. For example, the puppet government “elected” in Iraq after the civil war ended has secured deals both with Rothschild and Rockefeller owned Exxon and Chevron for oil extraction. Another example is US takeover of Syrian oil fields together with anti-government militants from Syrian Democratic Forces [4].
It is beyond the scope of this article to go into more details on how the Jewish establishment and their political and military wings in the West have cast wars onto the nations that could not be infiltrated or controlled otherwise. Nonetheless, war in Middle East and Africa has been undoubtedly the biggest “producer” of refugees and asylum seekers.
Step 2 comes with a catch. Traditionally, whenever mass displacement of people happen, they are settling either in other territories within the affected countries or in neighboring safer and generally more affluent countries. This does not happen for richer nations in Middle East like Saudi Arabia, UAE or Israel which are much closer to Afghanistan, Iraq or Syria but still refused to receive refugees (because a country with a normal government, borders, laws and a backbone has the right to decide whether they are willing to receive refugees or not). Yet, a large percentage of those refugees are being brought into Europe because European Union has decided that it has to take in as many refugees as is logistically possible. The reason is that the invasion of Europe with foreign people has been planned for decades prior, as demonstrated in other articles. Consequently, European Union and most of the local governments have created the laws and framework for mass immigration to take place “legally”, as EU Parliament explains [5]:
“In response to the refugee crisis in 2015, the European Commission presented proposals to reform the Common European Asylum System (CEAS) in 2016, including new laws to replace the Dublin System, which sets out rules to determine the allocation of asylum applicants among EU countries.
(…)
The new asylum system aims to support front line countries in times of pressure by introducing a new system of solidarity from other EU countries. The new system comes with flexibility, so EU countries will be able to choose how they can help fellow EU countries receiving many migrants by accepting asylum seekers from the country of first entry, by providing financial contributions or giving technical support, when needed.”
The above has been concretized in April 2024 [6]. On another note, George Soros has been an avid supporter of mass immigration into Europe and he has been very public, vocal and precise regarding his position, which has been published by the World Economic Forum [7]:
“George Soros: this is how Europe can tackle the refugee crisis
(…)
A comprehensive asylum policy for Europe, I believe, should establish a firm and reliable annual target of 300,000-500,000 refugees.
This plan would require at least €30 billion a year. This includes providing Turkey and other “frontline” countries enough financial support to allow the refugees living there to work and send their children to school; creating a common EU asylum agency and border force; addressing the humanitarian chaos in Greece; and establishing common standards across the EU for receiving and integrating refugees.”
And also in the Open Society Foundations [8]:
“Why Europe Must Embrace Its Refugees
I was one of millions in Europe who fled their homes after World War II. Following that humanitarian crisis, Europe adopted the Refugee Convention in 1951. This policy became its moral and operational backbone for decades (…)
Today, victims fleeing civil war in Syria and brutal government repression in countries like Eritrea are not being shown the same consideration.
The lack of a unified European policy towards asylum and migration has allowed member states to act selfishly and irresponsibly. Frontline countries like Greece and Italy are neglecting to provide adequate reception and asylum processing, while others, like Hungary, are sealing their borders to keep out those in need.”
Other international foundations based in the West that have been supporting and funding refugees immigration in Europe and United States are the Rockefeller Foundation [9], UNICEF [10] and International Rescue Committee [11].
Interestingly, there is virtually no information to be found about who is responsible for the refugee’s physical transit from their home countries to Europe, who is providing the boats and transportation means etc. Safe to believe however is that the above mentioned “humanitarian” foundations have an upper hand in this aspect. Nonetheless, it is known that in the last 10-15 years millions of people have arrived on European shores and have been “integrated”, with 2015 being the most active year due to intensification of civil wars across Middle East and some African states [12]. See reference attached for a year by year interactive infographic provided by EU Parliament in this regard.
Asylum applications in European Union in 2015
Following, international authorities and governments started to integrate those millions of refugees. Most governments provide asylum seekers free shelter or housing, free medical care and other basic needs. One example here is the UK Government’s position [13]:
“You can ask for somewhere to live, a cash allowance or both as an asylum seeker.
You’ll be given somewhere to live if you need it. This could be in a flat, house, hostel or bed and breakfast.
You’ll usually get £49.18 for each person in your household. This will help you pay for things you need like food, clothing and toiletries. (...)”
Such a policy is generally common in most Western countries. The controversy that arise from here is that refugees get to receive benefits that the natives don’t, they receive free training in order to get employed, free medical care, their children receive free education and clothing etc., something which the natives have to work and pay taxes in order to benefit from, and all of the above is mostly possible with the money generated by collecting taxes, by the VAT paid by the natives from their expenses etc. The very same policy is very similar in United States and Canada where large numbers of refugees and migrants from South America have left their countries either as “refugees” or illegally to settle in North America [14] [15], therefore US and Canada have similar migration policies to integrate migrants in a very similar fashion to Europe.
In the end and as with anything else a government does, is is the general majority, the ordinary people who have to suffer the consequences of these actions, against their will and against their interests. Is the general public who suffers the sky-rocketing crime or rape rates, violence, aggression and intolerance that many immigrants are bringing with them (since the vast majority of them are males in their 20s or 30s who have the capability to cause such), because they come from economically and morally undeveloped nations where the above animalistic behaviors are the daily norm. Even in these circumstances within society there is always division and two sides of people who have different beliefs and opinions, there are either those who fully support and agree with the policies to welcome whatever numbers of refugees in, and there are on the other side those who do not agree with any of this and consider that no refugees should step foot in their country.
As demonstrated, the situation is simply not a matter of merely agreeing or disagreeing with. Many refugees who arrive in Europe are genuine victims of the civil wars that the international financial and corporative Jewry and their military and government tools have cast upon their home countries. Once they are brught to the borders, not providing them with the basic human needs would mean that in short periods of time they will start suffering from starvation, thirst, misery and diseases. The authorities have not much choice but to either receive all refugees in or arrange physical efforts to return them to their home countries, which does not happen virtually at all due to the backlash that international, humanitarian and other organizations will create since Westerners have been programmed for decades to be tolerant and welcoming of all people and cultures (this will be discussed in more detail in another article) and not doing so will be equal to being a “nazi”, a “racist” and a “biggot” and punished/defamed by the public opinion, authorities and media. These are the labels that are being thrown to everybody that is not welcoming of the idea that the West is “multicultural” and “inclusive” of other people.
On the other side, what is also true is that most refugees who enter the West, they don’t like White people, they don’t like the West and they consider the West responsible for the problems happening in their home countries that forced them to leave. The reason here is that most people don’t have the necessary understanding, intelligence, willingness, objectivity and analytical aptitudes required to research matters deeper, to understand what is happening in reality and not what is projected by those who own the platforms and companies that tell people what is happening in the world based on their own private interests, and whose channels are always the easiest to reach when looking for information. Do you want to know about the the “civil war” in Afghanistan? Look no further than BBC, CNN, Wikipedia, Washington Post, New York Times etc. Why would you need to read deeper? After all they are the first results displayed by Google and other search engines wherever you look for information, and also they are the only ones presenting their version of the news on television. How many people are looking past them?
What hasn’t been mentioned above and is escaping to most people, is that there are large numbers of people who have settled in Europe not by asylum seeking or refugee route, but by simply finding physical means to be transported into Europe “illegally” (asylum seekers are only “legal” because the authorities have arbitrarily decided so, there isn’t really much difference). This is happening on one side due to Western governments being dangerously lenient on whoever enters the country by any means and the reluctance to deport them back to their home countries, and on the other side due to former colonial powers such as UK, France, Netherlands, Belgium or Spain being sympathetic and lenient towards their former colonies and towards the people that are emigrating from them. This way we see people that altogether count in the millions from countries that did not suffer anything that would force them to mass displacement, emigrating in mass from India, Algeria, Bangladesh, Turkey, Morocco or Pakistan into Europe or other nations. There are hundreds of thousands to millions of people from most African states, Asia or Middle East settled in Europe via means other than refugee or asylum routes. Same is happening in US with immigrants from Africa, Mexico, the Caribbean region and South American states not necessarily affected by crisis or civil wars. We see them all over the place, all over Europe and North America, yet the vast majority of people do not bother to even document themselves about what is happening.
How does all of the above have to do with race-mixing? Race-mixing is the ultimate goal of everything that has been explained above, this has been explained in-depth in the article
The Goal of Multiculturalism and Race-Mixing In White Nations.
