Political Involvement in Promoting Race-Mixing
Initially this article was intended to focus on governments and associated state structures as people generally regard these to be the highest authorities in any country but the truth is there are other major organizations that partake into this and have a heavier word to say than the vast majority of the governments.
Nonetheless, it may sound surprising or unrelated but in modern times the “blueprint” that made mass immigration and consequently uncontrolled race-mixing possible is the
Universal Declaration of Human Rights [1]. Although the invasion of Europe with non-native people is a plan that has existed for a lot longer, the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR) and the United Nations as a whole represent the “matrix” upon which the entire notion of globalization is built upon. As with many other things, UDHR is a double-edged sword. It was beneficial to empower the general people and give them more rights and freedoms which go beyond religious or political limitations (considering that a very large percentage of the world population are very much behind in ethics and morality, education and discipline and other values), but it also exposed most “civilized countries” (predominantly those inhabited by White people) to very large numbers of people from India, Africa, Middle East, South America moving into White countries and receiving the same social treatment and benefits as the natives based on UDHR (therefore becoming “equal” to them).
The reality is that, only the Western developed countries had the legal foundation, economy and philosophy to adhere to such a declaration. In the rest of the world not only that the Declaration is not compatible with local political systems, but these countries never even intended to adhere to it. By analyzing some of the rights and freedoms established in the Declaration [2], it can be deduced that the West has been more of a target for these policies, rather than them being designed to empower people world-wide.
- Article 4:
No one shall be held in slavery or servitude; slavery and the slave trade shall be prohibited in all their forms.
Slavery, child slavery and forced labor has existed and still exist in places like South-East Asia or certain countries of Africa. When has United Nations ever addressed this issue or took any diplomatic measures to try to mitigate this? Probably never, yet every single somewhat big company in the West must have a specific section in their terms and conditions dedicated to modern slavery and how much they do not condone to it. The reason is that the countries where they are based on have the legal system and infrastructure in place to prevent and combat modern slavery.
- Article 14: Everyone has the right to seek and to enjoy in other countries asylum from persecution.
This could be single-handedly the article within UDHR that can justify the movement of large masses of people from their home country to other countries. If one asked the authorities how did such people end up in all Western major cities, the authorities would likely argue that they have a “right to seek asylum” as they were facing persecution or other forms of abuse in their home countries (a blatant lie in many cases). The Declaration does not explain what countries are supposed to offer this asylum and on what basis but it unironically looks like most developed White countries took it on themselves to offer asylum to everyone from the entire planet. It is difficult to explain otherwise how so many people even from very remote countries ended up in Europe, US or Canada for example, as otherwise it would be impossible for the majority of people from Middle East or Africa to meet the legal requirements to legally relocate to Europe or North America. This is not happening in other richer countries like Saudi Arabia or Israel which do not grant asylum to any of the people that are being brought into Europe or other places.
Article 16 (2): Marriage shall be entered into only with the free and full consent of the intending spouses;
United Nations must tell that to the followers of islam. According to Islamic law, men can marry underage girls without their consent and also impregnate them as pedophilia and rape is defended and tolerated in Islam. Not only that UN does not address this flagrant abuse of women’s rights and dignity in muslim countries, but muslims bring this atrocity into the West and the governments are actively protecting them under the facade of “equality and inclusion”.
The examples can go on and on. The conclusion from here is that most of the world does not care about UDHR and these “rights and freedoms” are deliberately abused in the West to “equalize” an illegal immigrant or “asylum seeker” (a large percentage of these people are not seeking asylum per se) to the native population and therefore to defend most of their criminal acts and wrongdoing under the disguise of “diversity”, “equality” and right to practice their religion and culture. Imagine if a government would try to fight all of the criminality that these people are committing on a daily basis, it would be swiftly labeled as racist, extremist and intolerant by “freedom activists” and international mass media.
What happened next is that western governments started to adapt the law in order to make their countries more welcoming of refugees and immigrants. United States has revoked the anti-miscegenation law in most of its states between 1948-1967 [3]. How many people know nowadays that race-mixing was illegal in most of the United States until 1967? Probably not a lot. It would be “racist” and “race-supremacist” to even think of that. Yet something has happened that turned this centuries old healthy law of racial and cultural segregation upside-down.
In a country where race-mixing is banned, the local population will automatically not be very welcoming of foreign people migrating in numbers of hundreds of thousands or in the millions. In the last decades the population has been systematically dumped down and brainwashed into never-ending tolerance by mass-media, movie industry and other tools in the hands of those who have the interest for White nations to become multicultural mixing pots, with the complicit permission and involvement of most traitorous and treacherous governments. European Union does not even hide of this agenda and is subtly established in their values and goals [4]:
- Human rights are protected by the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights. These cover the right to be free from discrimination on the basis of sex, racial or ethnic origin, religion or belief, disability, age or sexual orientation, the right to the protection of your personal data, and the right to get access to justice.
European Parliamentary Union is also founded in 1947 by the infamous Richard von Coudenhove-Kalergi as an intergovernmental organization which gradually grew to what it is today. When it was founded, the vast majority of the European population was White and either christian or atheist, this has also been the case for decades after EU was created. Who needed to be “free from discrimination” on the basis of religion or ethnic origin when everyone had the same ethnic origins and beliefs? It is obvious who this law was created for and nowadays the above can be found in the rules and conditions of the vast majority of bigger enterprises and organizations. Then, in the agenda for 2019 - 2024, European Union state about the priority of a “comprehensive migration policy”. The question is, since when is European Union permitted to have migration policies? European Union was theoretically “intended” (probably not, really) to be exclusively an economic organization based on cooperation between member states. European Union is not an official country with an official defined territory. Member states of European Union have defined territories and act independent of European Union, with independent laws on migration. Based on individual jurisdictions, the free immigration into any European country is for the most part illegal as no country simply open their arms to whoever wants to come in from all over the world. The only people that can freely move within EU are European citizens from the member states.
Another “priority” of European Union (whilst there are endless Europeans who are starving or homeless) [6]:
- Upholding fundamental rights and the rule of law as a bastion of equality, tolerance and social fairness. Addressing security risks, protecting and empowering consumers, as well as developing a system for legal and safe migration while effectively managing the EU’s external borders, modernising the EU’s asylum system and cooperating closely with partner countries.
The above speaks for itself. European Union basically throws the immigration laws of every member state in the bin and say “all refugees welcome” and the native population has been “re-educated” through everything available (school/education, mass-media and television, movie and music industry, laws, activism etc.) to tolerate them as to not be considered “racist” and thrown into prison. There are also presidents like the former president of United States Joe Biden who has been busy asking people how many adverts with mixed-race families have they seen on TV on the last break [7] and say that “we have hope” (hope for what? To turn United States into the second Brazil?). Most people (apart from his voters, probably) knew even before he was elected in 2020 that his mental health was very poor most of the time and he cannot speak normally without some sort of aid, be it medicine or a prompter, but it has always been obvious that he has always been a tool of propaganda and implementation of multiculturalism in United States.
Therefore we can observe the trajectory that most White nations have embarked on after World War 2 (after supposedly “”winning”” it), as the plan for mass-immigration was already laid down many years prior to that. It makes one wonder, who did actually win WW2? Was it Britain? Russia? France? Modern times tend to disagree. For if the other “side” was to win, we would live in a completely different world today.