The Truth about Apartheid in South Africa
South Africa is a unique country, “Western inspired” and built by Dutch people on the African continent, the only one of this kind. Also one of the largest and developed economies in Africa for decades and the richest one by GDP as of 2024 [1]. Like United States of the 20th century, South Africa had a legislation of racial segregation in place in order to prevent race-mixing, which enraged those people that practice racial segregation in their own country. The Apartheid essentially collapsed due to international economic warfare upon itself and outside interference which culminated in a communist and zionist backed revolution. [2]
Nelson Mandela at a 1990 SACP rally [3]
As is the case with the Third Reich, it proves difficult to verify the information available in regards to the Apartheid system in South Africa due to lack of evidence that traces back to South African writings, laws, actions etc. from the time when those would have happened. It seems clear that the biggest problem with the South African Apartheid was not any supposed oppression towards the native Black population or anything related to this, but the mere fact that racial segregation existed, consisting in territorial separation between Blacks and Whites, separate education systems etc. but all under one government. It is difficult to understand what exactly is so destructive or anti-human with different races living in separate territories, this is how humanity lived for most of its time but again as we saw with Germany, the entire situation boils down to a Western context where the old order of racialism and segregation is being systematically destroyed and replaced with absolute admixture of different races, cultures, traditions etc.
There is very little verifiable evidence that the native Black population of South Africa suffered any infringement of human rights under the Apartheid government, whose sole goal was to built a powerful country with a racially “clean” population where individual racial groups would function in their own territories. So happened despite permanent attempts from the Jewish-ruled international establishment to overthrow the Apartheid since its very inception in 1948. Whites have built a country that became one of the richest and most developed in Africa. There are however surviving English online documents of Apartheid legislation [4], and while most present-day sources of information claim that the Apartheid government committed all the horrible things against the native populations, by analyzing the legislation from the time it can be observed that no atrocity has ever been committed by the White population towards the natives.
Apartheid has indeed established separate territories and authorities for each racial group, but the natives of these groups had the powers, rights and freedoms to be self-governing, learn, receive education and all the benefits of any normal citizen, which is evident when studying the actual laws themselves and not what online sources claim about these laws. As an example, Digital Innovation South Africa (an online resource and library about the history of South Africa) claims through the Bantu Homelands Citizens Act of 1970 that the native populations that would receive citizenship of their new, self-governing territory will have their South-African citizenship removed. This is a lie and the actual Law established the exact opposite in Section 2, (4) [5]:
(4) A citizen of a territorial authority area shall not be regarded as an alien in the Republic and shall, by virtue of his citizenship of a territory forming part of the Republic, remain for all purposes a citizen of the Republic and shall be accorded full protection according to international law by the Republic.
Another example is where World Atlas states that it was nearly impossible for non-Whites to own land according to the Group Areas Act of 1950 [6]. This is again a lie as shown for one by Wikipedia [7]”
Nelson Mandela said of the Act in his book, Long Walk to Freedom:
"the Groups Areas Act was the foundation of residential apartheid. Under its regulations, each racial group could own land, occupy premises, and trade only in its own separate area. Indians could henceforth only live in Indian areas, Africans in African, Coloureds in Coloured.
Another example is the legislation itself where there is no mention whatsoever of anything that would make it difficult for natives to own land, but even the opposite. The only places that natives were not allowed to occupy were mining districts, as explained in section 131 (1). A section above in 130 (1) there is a mention that comes as direct contradiction to World Atlas’ statement [8]:
“Save as is provided in section twenty-four no right under this Act, Law No. 15 of 1898 or a similar prior law may be acquired by a coloured person; Provided that this section shall not apply in relation to the acquisition by a coloured person of immovable property as defined in the Group Areas Act, 1950 (Act No. 41 of 1950), which such coloured person may lav/fully acquire under the said Act.”
It can be observed therefore that a lot of “educational” platforms that appeared in the internet era in a context of removal of any racial values or norms have twisted the apartheid legislation only to satisfy and justify the current agenda of racial assimilation and vilifying and destroying any Whites that try to have a semblance of racial preservation.
Once “democracy” has set in after the Apartheid, the natives headed by Nelson Mandela and backed by the international Jewry have taken over the country and South Africa has been going downhill ever since, as shown by the poor management of basic infrastructure [9], rape and sexual abuse sky-rocketing to where South Africa is one of the leading countries in the entire world on this end [10] and corruption has reached its highest peak in the period 2009-2018 during the presidency of Jacob Zuma with ramifications in the justice system, law enforcement, economy and even discouraging people from reporting corruption:
“Corruption was at its highest during the period of state capture under the presidency of Jacob Zuma and has remained widespread, negatively "affecting criminal justice, service provision, economic opportunity, social cohesion and political integrity" in South Africa.
South Africa has a robust anti-corruption framework, but laws are inadequately enforced and accountability in public sectors such as healthcare remain below par. In addition, internal sanctions have been employed to discourage whistle-blowers from reporting corrupt activities in both the public and private sectors – according to a 2021 Afrobarometer survey, 76.2% of South Africans believe that ordinary people risk retaliation and other negative consequences if they report incidents of corruption.”
While this is typical of many other corrupt countries in the world, what is unique and specific about South Africa is that the native population have taken over an already developed, first world and powerful country.
Another argument that is usually brought up for the purpose of further vilifying the Apartheid is the wealth inequality in South Africa and that Whites have acquired more wealth due to their “racist” policies. This is simply debunked by the fact that Whites have established self-governing territories within South Africa, therefore every racial group had the powers and freedoms to build their own economy and wealth. Also, wealth inequality is generally the most commonly observed in the most corrupt nations where a small group of people (politicians, their families, friends, cooperatives etc.) hijack as much money from the economy as they can get away with, something which is very typical of South Africa after Apartheid rule.
If Whites were the richest people during Apartheid, it has nothing to do with “racist” policies, but it has to do with the very reason why White countries are the most advanced and developed in the world while Black nations list on all statistics as mediocre or worse in this regard, and this is because White people are civilization-builders by nature, people that always worked towards the highest aspirations of living and development that they could achieve wherever and whenever they built any civilization. This has also been admitted in regards to South Africa by the late Zulu King Goodwill Zwelithini, who stated [11]:
King Zwelithini said the former white rulers of South Africa had “built a powerful government with the strongest economy and army on the continent.”
He went on to say that the white government had “a mighty army, and that the South African currency and economy had shot up” under the National Party government.
“But then,” he continued, “came this so-called democracy in which black people are destroying the gains of the past. The economy that we are now burning down.”
Meanwhile, Black people are yet to catch up and is only in the 21st century in the last 10-15 or so years when a few Black nations in Africa started to slowly uplift themselves from poverty and corruption and build more prosperous nations with better living conditions for their people. “Wealth inequality” in South Africa nowadays is mostly being blamed on Whites being a lot wealthier, which if it was the case it only means that after 30 years of rule the Black leadership has not been able to reduce such wealth gaps between Whites and Blacks (and this cannot be just “done” if White people are simply more capable or earning more money through being more competent and skilled) whereas in reality it is the unprecedented generalized political corruption and very poor management of a wealthy country that is causing such massive levels of inequality.