The Western Living Standard Crisis
Life is getting very expensive and out of hand for most people living in the West, that’s no news to anybody. There are however, severe demographic consequences that not only damage the evolution of the local population, but damage is exacerbated by the integration of millions of foreign people, a situation that on long term is taking dangerous proportions.
There is not even a need for statistical evidence to say that due to the immense increase in living costs especially after the coronavirus global social experiment, White people just don’t have as many children as they used to have say prior to the 2000s, this is also no news to anybody. Nowadays people fear that they can no longer secure a safe and prosperous future for their children and that they cannot provide them a decent or more than decent lifestyle. The reasons for these are justified as nowadays bearing children has (purposefully) become very expensive.
Is this done due to overpopulation?
Is Europe, United States, Canada or Australia for example overpopulated? Are governments increasing living costs on purpose to counter overpopulation?
Some people might argue that yes, these are overpopulated, while other might argue that they aren’t. Objectively speaking, the best and most easily observable factor that shows these regions
are not overpopulated, is the fact that every single year these nations receive altogether hundreds of thousands to millions of refugees, migrants, asylum seekers etc. from all over the world. Therefore, if there is space and infrastructure for them, then there is space and infrastructure for native population growth, for whom the space and infrastructure initially existed in the first place but now these are gradually being taken over and served on a platter to foreign, undeserving people. Therefore, overpopulation control is not the reason why it became nearly impossible for average people with average income or less (i.e. the vast majority of the population) to have more than one, maximum two children, and this with great sacrifices and limitations.
This trend also happens only in the most developed nations. Whilst the White regions mentioned above serve as examples (as they are the main target of everything discussed here), generally speaking there is a relation of direct proportionality between living costs and living conditions in most developed nations around the world, meaning that higher standards of living, or higher “human development index” as Wikipedia calls it, will incur higher living costs (higher rents, higher taxes, higher bills, possibly higher prices for goods and services etc). On the other end of the spectrum, poorer nations with poorer living conditions also, expectedly, have lower living costs compared to richer nations (not necessarily that they are “low” for the people living there, the relation is quite similar here). The situation got to where, a couple earning 3000 GBP / 3920 USD per month (which objectively is a large salary by most countries’ standard) can live in very high luxury in a country like Democratic Republic of Congo [1], whereas the same salary will likely make an average person (one person) living month to month in a slightly more expensive town or city in UK for example, a scenario where a couple that earns this money will have a hard time raising one child at all, let alone more.
Human Development Index map, Wikipedia
We can observe above that most of Europe (except of the East), north America and Australia all fit into the bracket of the countries with the highest standards of living yet, counter-intuitively, it is the people living in the poorest areas in the rest of the planet that reproduce the most. This is where the second demographic disaster comes in. Apart from higher living costs which prevents natives to reproduce, there are also very large numbers of foreign people coming from much poorer countries and integrate predominantly in Europe and North America. Unlike the White natives, these people coming from poorer areas are predictably going to have a lot more children, certainly a lot more than the natives will. This trend has been going on for example in India, where islam was introduced in the 7th century, has “integrated” and now it is the second largest religion in India with around 172 million followers, or roughly 14.2% of the population. [2]
Obviously, 13 centuries is a very long time and only 14% may seem rather small. However, it is inaccurate to project the same scenario in Europe for example where Islam is growing rapidly year by year. Unlike India, Europe had a virtually stagnating population in the last 3 decades and this is only going to continue in the foreseeable future. Then, hundreds of thousands of muslim migrants are injected into Europe every year, most of which are young men and women that are most likely to be granted permanent residence and reproduce as time goes. The population of Europe, a rather old one, may seem very large now, but by the currents trends, with the spreading of muslims and Islam in Europe, and with the “integration” supports, grants and benefits they receive from local authorities, there might come a time in the following decades where non-White birth rates (mostly from Middle-Eastern, African and mixed families) are going to surpass native birth rates, which will be a demographic catastrophe for Europe on long term and in the farther future. This can be observed today on a micro-level in European cities were large numbers of the native population and fleeing due to expensive living and lack of safety and security that mass immigration has created. These are likely the first areas where foreign populations will become dominant/majority as time goes, followed by smaller cities and so on.
2016 Muslim Population in Europe [3]
The same has been happening in United States which for decades has been receiving very large numbers of immigrants predominantly from South and Central America, China and India.
Immigrant percentages, US [4]
Adding to this the Black population that has been brought into US during the Jewish-operated slave trade [5], the percentage of the White population has considerably decreased over the decades despite the population increase, to where it sits as 61.6% as of 2020, according to Wikipedia.
Now, based on human development indexes, there is a connection between lack of education + poverty and high birth rates, and higher education + higher living conditions and lower birth rates. Given the projections and statistics, immigrants, refugees, asylum seekers etc. are not very bothered by high costs of living and they are going to reproduce in large numbers exactly in the same way their co-nationals are doing in their “poorer” home countries. The results of where this is going are unfortunately rather obvious.